Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Brazilian Market Jacksonville
all know that education is fundamental. This is a patently obvious statement. But it seems, few people know that, today, environmental education is fundamental as well as being essential. For the ecological damage that mankind has been inflicting on the planet for centuries joins now the narrowness of the ruling classes. And not because it is said.
The government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has spent a whopping € 580,000 to buy 30,000 copies of the film by Al Gore to hand out by the schools in Spain. However, a radio station with national coverage ensures that three regions have refused to receive these copies.
The Basque Country has argued that this film is dubbed in Euskera, and Castilla y León and the Canary Islands, as stated in the station's website, "have not advanced any reason for this rejection." Basque children will not understand the things you never say in Basque is not because they have decided their politicians. Not entitled to know anything other than explained in your language, but know the Perfection other, say English, French, or Finnish. This is called tunnel vision, emanating from a navel-gazing and reactionary sentiment. One could draw the conclusion that everything is not explained in Basque does not contribute to the education of children of that community, or does not exist for the Basques.
Castilla León In further aggravating the situation is still, the children of Salamanca, Avila and Zamora, or the rest of the provinces of this community, nor will this report (and not because they know English or English) not will serve as teaching material that they stand to talk about the health of the planet, human attitudes, or the environmental management of their local governments. The cause? One of two things: either silence or administrative entity responsible for the regional government considers that this material is irrelevant or the topic for the education of future citizens. Surely someone has thought that in Valladolid not exist, nor there, climate change.
But what in the Canaries? Why refuse this educational material in a community where 42% of the space is protected, where there is an island that claims to be one hundred percent sustainable, and in which the newly formed regional government has created a Climate Change Agency? Is this mere window-dressing? Can be seeing the importance attached to such a sensitive issue as environmental education in schools. Do you know everything and children canaries on the greenhouse effect? Do you have and all necessary materials and do not need anything else that supports your training? Has he forgotten the officer in this request for copies that are the responsibility of schools in the islands? Or is that the Government intends Paulino Rivero to fold the documentary 'the Guanche'? Again we must say: narrow-mindedness.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Witty Comments For Wedding Card
Mammoth with four wheels in the pits
are a favorite among players. These are not top models or starlets inflated by the skill of surgeons, but 4x4 vehicle. Football players do not embody precisely the image of arbitrators of good taste, but it can be considered an effective barometer of the strength of this phenomenon that has entered the urban landscape a device that, in principle, was intended to be used in rural areas.
When the auto industry seemed to reason by force of circumstance, the manufacture of increasingly smaller units emerged in recent years, this counter fashion imposed the excessive and high fuel consumption. Against the proliferation of these real tanks for domestic use, a movement has emerged, particularly in Europe, start to take them by a real enemy of the civilized world and the environment.
The SUVs are seen by these activists as "the psychological vector of a certain form of male power." They argue that, as with all consumer goods, advertising seeks to convince the buyer that, with the acquisition, has increased its importance as a person. Mixing to be and have, its users fall prey to the myth of male dominance and strength over the rest of the weak.
The motto of the anti 4x4 " Not safe, not clean, Not Cool" ("neither safe nor clean, nor canchero") and proposed, at a minimum, are charged higher taxes and higher prices in parking lots. The more radical call for their outright ban in urban areas of high population. Her activism does not live on the photos in newspapers, and who rely on individual acts. So, distribute a fake parking cards, in which are all environmental features repudiate, to put on the windshields of these trucks.
The aggressiveness of the drivers of 4x4s is reflected, say his enemies, in oil-importing states, who then claim their neo-colonial attitudes in order to maintain supplies to the insatiable vampire naphtha. It's time to hold the owners of the road for all the deaths in recent years in Iraq. The homo-automobilis believes in a "security myth" that the anti 4x4 judge completely false and counterproductive. Then cite a study by the British Medical Journal that found that 4x4 drivers are four times more likely to use cell phones while driving and not wearing a seatbelt. The error of believing
safer than a normal car takes them to behave more risky. The typical scene of the mother loading or unloading their children from a huge truck in front of the school deserved a reflection of the ineffable London Mayor Ken Livingstone: "When you see someone trying to maneuver such a vehicle near the entrance of school can not think but it is a complete idiot. "Among the top ten reasons to wield the anti 4x4, the first is:" You're not a farmer ", to mark the urban error involving the use of something that does not conform to the city . But pressure from the media machine is so strong that are left to rely on the strength of the individual who is not given in our days, both for what you buy, but rather, so that refuses to buy.
Source: Bernardo
Sagastume
MP Agency http://www.agenciamp.com.ar/
are a favorite among players. These are not top models or starlets inflated by the skill of surgeons, but 4x4 vehicle. Football players do not embody precisely the image of arbitrators of good taste, but it can be considered an effective barometer of the strength of this phenomenon that has entered the urban landscape a device that, in principle, was intended to be used in rural areas.
When the auto industry seemed to reason by force of circumstance, the manufacture of increasingly smaller units emerged in recent years, this counter fashion imposed the excessive and high fuel consumption. Against the proliferation of these real tanks for domestic use, a movement has emerged, particularly in Europe, start to take them by a real enemy of the civilized world and the environment.
The SUVs are seen by these activists as "the psychological vector of a certain form of male power." They argue that, as with all consumer goods, advertising seeks to convince the buyer that, with the acquisition, has increased its importance as a person. Mixing to be and have, its users fall prey to the myth of male dominance and strength over the rest of the weak.
The motto of the anti 4x4 " Not safe, not clean, Not Cool" ("neither safe nor clean, nor canchero") and proposed, at a minimum, are charged higher taxes and higher prices in parking lots. The more radical call for their outright ban in urban areas of high population. Her activism does not live on the photos in newspapers, and who rely on individual acts. So, distribute a fake parking cards, in which are all environmental features repudiate, to put on the windshields of these trucks.
The aggressiveness of the drivers of 4x4s is reflected, say his enemies, in oil-importing states, who then claim their neo-colonial attitudes in order to maintain supplies to the insatiable vampire naphtha. It's time to hold the owners of the road for all the deaths in recent years in Iraq. The homo-automobilis believes in a "security myth" that the anti 4x4 judge completely false and counterproductive. Then cite a study by the British Medical Journal that found that 4x4 drivers are four times more likely to use cell phones while driving and not wearing a seatbelt. The error of believing
safer than a normal car takes them to behave more risky. The typical scene of the mother loading or unloading their children from a huge truck in front of the school deserved a reflection of the ineffable London Mayor Ken Livingstone: "When you see someone trying to maneuver such a vehicle near the entrance of school can not think but it is a complete idiot. "Among the top ten reasons to wield the anti 4x4, the first is:" You're not a farmer ", to mark the urban error involving the use of something that does not conform to the city . But pressure from the media machine is so strong that are left to rely on the strength of the individual who is not given in our days, both for what you buy, but rather, so that refuses to buy.
Source: Bernardo
Sagastume
MP Agency http://www.agenciamp.com.ar/
Monday, February 11, 2008
Girdles форум
Transatlantic
Ecologists in Action recently released a comprehensive study which shows that all-terrain vehicles not due to sustainability criteria. That is, the jeep, 4x4, the 'truck' as they say in Venezuela, are a serious threat to the environment, because there are more common in urban environments and the amount of waste and emissions generated are greater than the other vehicles. Again
reaction to an old problem late. Every day in Spain sold thousands of cars in this category, and advertising that makes them is based on identifying the owners of these large ships with wheels as an individual or individuals involved and close to natural spaces, modern adventurers, people who landscape and inhospitable looking away from where the city and its "treacherous" conditions. But what a paradox, the equation yields an unexpected result: the regular user of the road (in cities) is often a kind of affluent, urban, barely out of their city limits, and that is 'dirty' rather little in the mud of the roads.
And there lies the real problem. The dilemma is that these cars are bad for the health of the planet, but think it is their use regulated which is wrong. If utility, needed to work in rural areas (still sold the Land Rover Santana, well suited in the field) have become real assets luxury consumption, and its use, unconscious and selfish, smoke-filled cities, the air of negative emissions because they are heavier and more powerful.
The solution is complicated. An extra tax, as envisaged will put little or nothing to reduce the sale of such cars. Who can spend 30 or 35 thousand euros in a 4x4, do stop to think that budding few hundred euros a year limit "the taste you feel when driving? It is not supposed to. The municipalities should be to limit their use in urban precincts: "In this city can not move 4x4, no bumpy enough," would be a good slogan. Would you seem unreasonable? Or perhaps, can navigate liners for swimming pools?
Ecologists in Action recently released a comprehensive study which shows that all-terrain vehicles not due to sustainability criteria. That is, the jeep, 4x4, the 'truck' as they say in Venezuela, are a serious threat to the environment, because there are more common in urban environments and the amount of waste and emissions generated are greater than the other vehicles. Again
reaction to an old problem late. Every day in Spain sold thousands of cars in this category, and advertising that makes them is based on identifying the owners of these large ships with wheels as an individual or individuals involved and close to natural spaces, modern adventurers, people who landscape and inhospitable looking away from where the city and its "treacherous" conditions. But what a paradox, the equation yields an unexpected result: the regular user of the road (in cities) is often a kind of affluent, urban, barely out of their city limits, and that is 'dirty' rather little in the mud of the roads.
And there lies the real problem. The dilemma is that these cars are bad for the health of the planet, but think it is their use regulated which is wrong. If utility, needed to work in rural areas (still sold the Land Rover Santana, well suited in the field) have become real assets luxury consumption, and its use, unconscious and selfish, smoke-filled cities, the air of negative emissions because they are heavier and more powerful.
The solution is complicated. An extra tax, as envisaged will put little or nothing to reduce the sale of such cars. Who can spend 30 or 35 thousand euros in a 4x4, do stop to think that budding few hundred euros a year limit "the taste you feel when driving? It is not supposed to. The municipalities should be to limit their use in urban precincts: "In this city can not move 4x4, no bumpy enough," would be a good slogan. Would you seem unreasonable? Or perhaps, can navigate liners for swimming pools?
Friday, February 8, 2008
How Much Money Will You Get From Recycling?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)