I say it's a classic. Someone, enthusiastic (and to a greater extent naive) says, "is one of the best films of the horror genre, categorized into spectral manifestations, you'll see in your entire miserable life." I omit the adjective with which it tries to soften my life, it may not be as wrong as the rest of the fallacies with which this stranger carefully, brazenly good taste. "How do you say the name of this terrific little gem that, oddly, would not appear in my already compressed video library?" I inquire, and the answer is almost as stubborn as my question: "Replacing fallacious." Insistole, incredulous friend: Replacement fallacious. What could you expect from a film that reflects a similar title? a film that contradicts my dire expectations, of course. An argument unexplored. A surprise from the director nod, an eerie silence, a toothless woman stalking the lead, with the handle of a saw positioned strategically within their contorted crotch, walking toward the squat while reciting, why not, "the hilarious song of the Devil" the great Lamborghini. A bloody tit, at least. Something to awaken my interest. Something that even has nothing to do with terror. This is traced to any price a work, whatever, "Replacing False "in this case after reading the title. I do not care that a translation is inefficient, a grace dubbing manager. A film, and in Argentina, and in Malaysia, respond to this catastrophe and its director name does not make a media frenzy about it, is enough to repeat, expect some sort of retribution as a spectator. And yes, not two, not three. One, at least. A single boob. An action so low and easy ... and not even that subtle effort.
After seeing a movie like this scum intolerable is that I'm back to encourage others to think about the motivation for creating the syndicated viewers. Why why, if a writer who has written a text of this eschatological nature has (in addition to the pristine nerve) the right to join the "writers strike", we can not do, then we deserve "strike viewers? Imagine! march waving posters fellowship to pray titles like "The Changeling" "The Butterfly Effect II" "Zack and Miri make a porno", each with its respective symbol above prohibition. Cinéphiles adolescents and the famous Hurley Reyes Buenos Aires, each holding a flag at its ends with the only legend "JJ Abrams" and perhaps one or two kisses captured with the rouge of the militants on that name. Do not forget, either, to posters that capture the face of Che Guevara, waving over our heads, these religiously in any event, including this one. Is not that, sweet reader, which you would call a brilliant idea? Then I give the rights of my invention. You have my coveted permission to implement it. Personally, I do not attend any social event in which not flatter me, touch or offer free alcohol. And much less organized.
But, dear, it's time to stop getting lost in the seductive songs of fantastic projects. Let me chart the reason for my rejection for this circle unclassifiable events that I found ridiculous "Replacing fallacious." Puntualizaré only in the most incredible of all, you have laughed with genuine chutzpah of my unblemished reputation as a critical observer. This is the first minutes. Without going into details of the synopsis, in this, the first sequence, we see a family (child, mother, father) that his car has shown a mechanical failure, without more, was the thoroughness of its primary functions . The car, in fact, has stopped working. The family genes clearly joyful insightful, decides to push. I forgot to mention that the setting is a lonely road covered with snow, adorned only by trees and an unusual telephone booth. That is, a writer has decided to draw a telephone booth in the middle of a lonely road covered with snow. And not contented with that, (and in favor of this conclusion is that good looking, once again, my outstanding sexual performance) our microbiota jester has fantasized about the rest of his monologue decomposed to be taken credibly.
Luckily, a year later, in 1981 to be exact, who was one of the writers of "Replacing Falaz" (because reality is not only stranger than fiction, but that detracts: two writers, no one who repaired the idea the other in respect of surrealism would involve the provision of the cabin. But the grail flavored is my gun! Whether to have perhaps the celebrated together!) Who was one of them, he said, assumed his condition and inked his pen to draw the adventures of the first theatrical experiment successful ineffective and yet Chuck "Texas Ranger" Norris, the child comedy " An eye for an eye. "
emphasize, for those readers confused, I said Chuck Norris, but not Kiefer Sutherland. Let us not confuse films for more (but accurate) that are similar titles. Here is a picture
dedicated to those skeptical (would clarify that my skepticism toward word, according to a study at the prestigious University Bobby Fisher, based in Palembang, Indonesia, is a sequel of a sexual nature relating to impotence) that dared to question my honesty:
After seeing a movie like this scum intolerable is that I'm back to encourage others to think about the motivation for creating the syndicated viewers. Why why, if a writer who has written a text of this eschatological nature has (in addition to the pristine nerve) the right to join the "writers strike", we can not do, then we deserve "strike viewers? Imagine! march waving posters fellowship to pray titles like "The Changeling" "The Butterfly Effect II" "Zack and Miri make a porno", each with its respective symbol above prohibition. Cinéphiles adolescents and the famous Hurley Reyes Buenos Aires, each holding a flag at its ends with the only legend "JJ Abrams" and perhaps one or two kisses captured with the rouge of the militants on that name. Do not forget, either, to posters that capture the face of Che Guevara, waving over our heads, these religiously in any event, including this one. Is not that, sweet reader, which you would call a brilliant idea? Then I give the rights of my invention. You have my coveted permission to implement it. Personally, I do not attend any social event in which not flatter me, touch or offer free alcohol. And much less organized.
But, dear, it's time to stop getting lost in the seductive songs of fantastic projects. Let me chart the reason for my rejection for this circle unclassifiable events that I found ridiculous "Replacing fallacious." Puntualizaré only in the most incredible of all, you have laughed with genuine chutzpah of my unblemished reputation as a critical observer. This is the first minutes. Without going into details of the synopsis, in this, the first sequence, we see a family (child, mother, father) that his car has shown a mechanical failure, without more, was the thoroughness of its primary functions . The car, in fact, has stopped working. The family genes clearly joyful insightful, decides to push. I forgot to mention that the setting is a lonely road covered with snow, adorned only by trees and an unusual telephone booth. That is, a writer has decided to draw a telephone booth in the middle of a lonely road covered with snow. And not contented with that, (and in favor of this conclusion is that good looking, once again, my outstanding sexual performance) our microbiota jester has fantasized about the rest of his monologue decomposed to be taken credibly.
Luckily, a year later, in 1981 to be exact, who was one of the writers of "Replacing Falaz" (because reality is not only stranger than fiction, but that detracts: two writers, no one who repaired the idea the other in respect of surrealism would involve the provision of the cabin. But the grail flavored is my gun! Whether to have perhaps the celebrated together!) Who was one of them, he said, assumed his condition and inked his pen to draw the adventures of the first theatrical experiment successful ineffective and yet Chuck "Texas Ranger" Norris, the child comedy " An eye for an eye. "
emphasize, for those readers confused, I said Chuck Norris, but not Kiefer Sutherland. Let us not confuse films for more (but accurate) that are similar titles. Here is a picture
dedicated to those skeptical (would clarify that my skepticism toward word, according to a study at the prestigious University Bobby Fisher, based in Palembang, Indonesia, is a sequel of a sexual nature relating to impotence) that dared to question my honesty:
As you know your mothers, ladies, I'm not a man of small caliber. Invitoles, both you and her cousins \u200b\u200bquince, to study this same scene, now in motion. Those daring, willing it can venture out to watch the entire movie. Would have to click here , summer. Her cousins, however, click here . Do not forget that this space gives them the privilege to contact me via "comments" because I would not let them free to pass on their predominant praises, my dear friends.
end my letter with this fraternal embrace for those who read, and this hot cock your sister Elena, said the immortal Doctor Tangalanga.
tomorrow.
