Best Gift For Newphew Newborn

OF THE NEED OF INTERPRETATION

Best regards and welcome to this humble blog.

today's short article revolves around the need to interpret a priori the city model chosen or designed for that at a later stage, the performance-fit the actual needs of the residents to whom it is directed.

Before proceeding to develop the article, we highlight, always in a concise, creative work that the city is divided into two stages: the first on

conceptualization, virtually, the model chosen, within the discretion enjoyed by government authorities, and so after a second stage that would be called the planned execution.

At this point, the second come in. The ideas suggested by the promoters and draw three-dimensional scene. That is the clogging of the lots suitable for use and the realization of the previously conceptualized.

But back to the germ of this article, we will point out the strong relationship enjoyed by administrative decisions on the choice of model drawn-either all or part of the municipality, on the use of urban spaces once you have accomplished by their recipients.

In this sense, not just the mere coupling to the law, not just compliance with the standards urban setting out the applicable law and not just a juridification of spatial aspects. Within that area of \u200b\u200bdiscretion enjoyed by the Administration in this case Local-to acquire a model city, it is essential to know to whom it may concern, know their customs, habits, use of space, needs, etc.. Knowledge of the use of urban spaces, and created, by the authorities and the planner have a decisive bearing on the outcome of the operation planning and relationship to be established between the two subjects of the dialogue.

is not unusual to see as inconsistencies manifest internal between different parts of a whole, that is, between different areas of recent housing developments with respect to the existing city, who speak a language entirely.

Therefore, when planning, studying can be good-first-the area on which works not only from a legal standpoint (ownership structure) or highly technical (terrain, terrain features, etc..), but go beyond, venturing to urban language that will connect the two spaces in the future. Without doubt that it will also be present facet sociological, but we do not just mean that. An underlying relationship between the spaces erected subsequent to that pre-existed, one contributes to another, one amending the other conditions.

It is in this aspect, we want to draw your attention, no doubt. We know, we sense that the city as a living, dynamic mutation, change their morphological features and adapt to the customs of its inhabitants. But in addition to modifying its external shell adjust their habits, interpretations or applications of this language we urban people as the only target of this activity. Within this function synallagmatic-carrier duties to both parties-is the interpretation of the proposed model, the model previously studied by forming an indivisible whole.

In past years the land use was carried from the economic point of view exclusively. It was only appealing the transformation of a given soil area if it met the precise economic characteristics and therefore did profitable. Was a commercial transaction. However, we have seen in a single support leg of the system has resulted in other problems, not just a great stock (pardon the Anglicized) of housing and poor soils and processed, but degradation of the urban scene, ultimately treatment of space as a commodity. Solutions repetitive, abusive, monochrome or just in line with the real needs of their recipients are plentiful in the geography.

Perhaps the right time to seek alternative routes and result in benefits for people who occupy those spaces later processed. One of these pathways or proposals go through a detailed study of the environment in which the operation unfolds, as previously targeted. A correct reading of the urban language allows us to be aware of what is really necessary, as is to be drawn into the organic whole and what is the ideal language "in the Kantian sense of the concept-to be used for this relationship to take the desired effect.

And finally, since the issue could be extended too much, it could be argued in defense of the smaller cities, these, when undertaking such an interpretation of urban language, have a greater burden than large cities. This is given for several reasons: the scarcity of resources of all kinds, a strong link to existing city model that is difficult to interpret a new urban language, lack, sometimes, a specific planning model that has resulting in a pastiche of interpretation impossible, the result of the various laws more or less expansive and, finally, a very strong historical component that demands to be treated with special care so that the model represents the entire city and not just an enclosed space and "fencing."

We, therefore, that in the planning phase has to work harder-not merely in economic and urban translate the language we want to talk to, thus intelligible to all recipients that the end of the day, we all are.

Thanks for being there. Planning until the next appointment;

take care and be happy.

UDB