Friday, July 16, 2010

Samaire Armstrong Cogiendo

MONOCULTURE SPACES ON THE CATALOGUE OF URBAN MANAGEMENT PLAN GENRAL


Best regards and welcome to this humble blog.


latest dates we gave last ending a long journey for the content of Urban catalog. However, reviewing the contents, we have found a worthwhile finding that he take a few minutes short of our attention.

This time it is a building dedicated to the hotel, in full swing, whose entry into the catalog seems a little forced by the then adduce reasons.

In particular the location of that property is as follows:



Location: Calle Los Herreros No. 62, Calle Zarcero

As for other properties we discussed prior to this, we reiterate that this is a building a relatively recent invoice, which is somewhat surprising, the General Plan's branded or representative of the rationalist movement in architecture and content of his architectural language.
The building in question is in better condition than its neighbor, but it is clear the absence of values \u200b\u200bdeterminants that could justify its inclusion in a general management determination (structuring) as is the catalog of protected property. Given the importance that this decision is for the private property and, in particular, for the same owners of the affected properties, it is necessary a reflection minimum rein in the euphoria discretionary this repeated ad nauseum by us.
The current implementation of the General Plan and must bring an almost constant problem because it acts as a cutting tool in the development of life (defined as development, not only geophysical but interrelated people with the spaces created) and the activity of the city. It is therefore necessary to adapt gradually to be determined by the private initiative that ultimately is the generation of new urban areas of quality, tailored, yes, the determination of planning and zoning rules that apply specific , the sole purpose of ordering a few spaces and densified and sometimes collapsed. Undoubtedly be interesting to see how the situation unfolds in the future. A future not without complications, both economic and social imperative which makes the cooperation of government through greater flexibility in decision-making and greater flexibility to regulated procedures accords with the existing ex lege.
This tab appears as a clear opportunity to adapt to the physical reality and social reality. We recommend, once again, his careful study and a subsequent right decision for that reality.

We know that the catalogs are presented as a more or less extensive list of goods which by their unique values \u200b\u200band characteristics, are deserving of special protection. Their inclusion operates as a condition for the implementation of this special regime of protection under the planning instrument itself.

The decision to view this building is representative of the ease with which, at times, important decisions that affect property rights directly and that the reverse if any, goes through situations drastic.

The urban context in which it takes place outside the building is protected because it is a scene from a very large variety of types. In turn, the finishing materials used are not married to each other and seem as if this were not enough, the same building as the crowning features in the cover materials prohibited by the Rules
Urbanísticas , hereinafter UN, so they reveal not understand the decision of its inclusion in the catalog. The use of materials foreign to the typology, symbolism or aesthetics of the particular property is a bleeding issue. In the foreground because it indicates that the Administration has not complied with the main objective is entrusted from the Constitution to ensure the public interest. Secondly, because there is a lack of order and means, or both, when applying planning regulations. And, thirdly, because keeping which produce interpretative conflict leads, inevitably, to a sense of impunity when undertaking reforms, improvements in short works on items already considered representative of local values.
Also, it seems that the decision
Corporation were adopted according to the needs that arise in this area because it is not a reflection of the urban contemplative in which it is located. Newly remodeled invoice, is the square before the protected building, in little or no help to a full understanding on environment and not partial or biased. This is clear evidence when you appreciate a wider view encompassing the whole architectural complex, which discovered a lack of pace and continuity of the vacuum generated by the same building and the saturation of styles that focus on the ledge the villa.
functionality presented by these adjacent buildings is incompatible with the demands of the new UN in numerous technical and legal aspects. Therefore, we believe it may be condemning many owners of both businesses and individuals to economic strangulation to do even more costly maintenance and public adornment. It follows an obvious conclusion is drawn or synthesis, not just the quantity but quality that matters the elements to be protected.

Due to this previous point, it compels the Consistory to develop plans and programs to offset and subsidize those homeowners that so unforgivable, have a property included in the catalog listing. This is not an innovation imposed or required by the association, but it is a measure already provided by the General Plan text and that so far has not been effective.

No doubt this situation is not irreversible. It is for this reason from this that he writes from the knowledge behind us we offer the necessary bridge for dialogue between the Administration
and the most affected, the owner.

Another point to consider would be discretion must know their limits as well shows the copious jurisprudence. This is a decision may be appealed to the courts when they drew up the usual catalog. However, there are other more attractive alternatives such as the modification of the catalog through the relevant procedure set out in our Planning Act and its implementing regulation.

So, keep trying to bring the Town Planning in the broadest sense of the word (in the absence of any term speculative and representative of reduced quality of life) to public life to local, in this way, we achieve the purpose for which the partnership was born: a more humane and livable city; a city with a higher quality aesthetic and functional living and the presence of values \u200b\u200bthat identify their true image and potential .

Serving this hermeneutic function of Planning will work to encourage reflection necessary for addressing issues of vital importance as is the case.


This is, strictly speaking, the fragment we want, from UDB, to share with the foregoing urbanistically speaking on these lands.

UDB

0 comments:

Post a Comment