Best regards and welcome to this humble blog.
is a real pleasure to be back among you and to share this knowledge with all urban. No doubt through the use of technologies can understand and, of course, and exchange views and visions of what constitutes the primary objective of this space of freedom: Urbanism.
This time we follow the path marked by a long tour of the heritage city edificatorio Benavente. On this occasion, the purpose of this review is a building that already had the opportunity to comment, When did you recognize the photo to see.
The reason for repeated comments of a building is none other than the damage they are suffering, not only from the standpoint of weather and neglect of the property. To this we add the crash some time ago a mud wall adjacent to the same property and that, from our point of view, belongs to the same property. had long threatened to collapse the wall above, with the passivity, the property first, and then from the administration that ultimately decided just before the imminent danger to persons and property, cordon off the perimeter of the facade.
Surely this is a problem that has been detected for some time. The maintenance of property, in this case buildings, protected is the responsibility of the owners, this is what the legislation, both state and regional, to another level, the instruments themselves planning or general management. But it seems that the imposition of this duty is not enough ex lege if not articulated joint action with the administrations and those affected us variandi
i planner, everything can be a dead letter.
This is the reason to make this brief comment on this site, to inform of all the need, when carrying out preparatory work for the drafting of a General Plan, communication between citizens and future users of the city drawn, public administrations as carriers of effective and sufficient administrative power to recognize the interest general and affected property owners and end users of this common message. Undoubtedly, achieving a voice acting is only very complicated but more complicated to implement and execute that design if it had not understood by stakeholders and participants.
In fine, we can conclude this review with emphasis on the essential fact, now with existing wall crash us two problems arise:
The first is as restitution by an order of execution or enforcement by management subsidiary of the work required to reconstruct the envelope for the sole purpose of preventing a mishap occurs. Remember, that currently have fences placed around the light leaving a gap of over three meters high with respect to the bottom line of the street. The second problem is the erosion that will suffer the item listed. Due to the absence of part of the protection provided by the cladding, which in turn supports a cover-medium demolished, it is true, has been uncovered part of the front side before was hidden and protected under the partial cover. That's bound to suffer neglect gives us a sad predicted for the famous building.
0 comments:
Post a Comment