Sunday, April 25, 2010
Best regards and welcome to this humble blog.
Immersed in the heat of spring and the arrival, therefore, the good weather and the desire to travel and visit other cities and towns of this country, we have, this time to chat about other architectural elements contained in the famous Catalogue of the General Plan Urban Benavente, subject to ongoing analysis.
In this sense, we will try to understand certain decisions of the competent urban administration and precisely within what we already know which is the urban development and public service designed to meet the interest and ensure general.
The truth is that the mere observation of the information is obtained almost immediately, a really poor impression of it and sometimes found with the variety of materials which are disposed therein. There are several triggers for this feeling found:
First, because you lose a great opportunity to continue the pace edificatorio which is on the avenue itself. That is, it would be to silt up the gap or interruption suffered by reason of building, given that the floor area of \u200b\u200bnot exhausting, as is highlighted in this case, because of its protection and composition, which allowed for the rest of the buildings would look like a noticeable dent to the naked eye by the presence of party walls bare not receiving specific treatment "facade" to avoid this inclusion of this property. Appears to be a general trend in the flow of life in the village of improvisation and poor planning when you consider what was discussed so far.
Secondly, the loss of buildable area on the plot itself caused by a circumstance based on the pure administrative discretion or exogenous factors such as representation and function played by the building museum
per se, it seems, in every rule, treatment unfair or disparate factual circumstance, what we would or should have been challenging that decision before the administrative courts. The harmful effects urbanistically speaking, caused by this decision will become more apparent when, over time, be built up again throughout the watershed surrounding the building subject of the claim.
per se, it seems, in every rule, treatment unfair or disparate factual circumstance, what we would or should have been challenging that decision before the administrative courts. The harmful effects urbanistically speaking, caused by this decision will become more apparent when, over time, be built up again throughout the watershed surrounding the building subject of the claim.
Por último, en tercer lugar, habría de ponderarse la escasa entidad y valía de lo protegido por el planificador. Prueba de ello es que se le otorga, también en esta ocasión, el nivel ambiental de protección, como cajón de sastre para todo aquello que se protege sin saber bien el objeto de tal protección, lo que significa que:
“el nivel ambiental protege el conjunto del ambiente urbano, evitando las actuaciones que pudieran atentar contra la trama y la calidad imperante en los ámbitos protect and defend the harmonious integration between the new and the architectural elements included in the integral and structural levels. "
§
case of a provision, has binding force, binding the wording leaves something to be desirable since it makes use of legal concepts that make it very difficult to interpret and generate great uncertainty. Expressions like " urban environment" or might undermine " not have a logical-deductive framing easy insertion into the mind of a lawyer. For urban environment can understand any place within what is known as urban land that is integrated into the urban network and that has, effectively, with the necessary public services and facilities and sufficient capacity to take such a statement. What would be considered threatening the urban environment? Nothing explains the use of terms as the present one within the body of a General Plan policy and even less in the content of rules to determine the contents of the catalog, due to the significant impact it has on private property and, above all, within a rigorous economic and policy especially as that we are living today. By knowing the zoning regulations or ordinances of the building and know the scope that the statutory right to property as it is. There was no need to add more vacuous precepts that do not add any new or complementary to existing ones. Therefore, it is considered that in the application for a license as regulated act has no place any attack at all and, especially since the establishment of due legal report prior collecting art. 99.1 b) of the LUCyL
that offers a priori
, warranties of true urban setting with the law.
, warranties of true urban setting with the law.
§ also tries to avoid actions that undermine the urban and quality prevailing in the protected areas to defend their integration with new smoothly. Well, we can begin to really know how you can perform an action, in consolidated urban land, which violates the urban area where there are official signs and slopes and when, in a detailed way the instrument of urban planning relevant determinations. For the term used in quality, it makes sense when applied within a protective action as a whole and not in isolation as is the case now discussed. It makes sense, as we say, in an area greater or more complex as a performance at a historical or performance envelope in a densified and to present relevant architectural values and a pre-existing accepted urban development, among which one could find the configuration and layout of the road. It makes no sense the application of these terms of protection when it is understood as protecting not part of any area to be protected from actions such as prescribed. In this case is nothing short of ridiculous to try to recognize a certain quality prevailing in the place where the property is protected by Administration, where is this quality? Looking at the setting and ambience, as like to call, there is no criterion to tell us or homogenizer unveil continued treatment of the area and there is no criterion optimizer and umbrella of what is to be regarded as well protected and motivation.
§ ornamental elements on the composition and use of materials collected in the we can argue the following form. They can meet some of the provisions contained in the General Plan relating to accessibility, safety and livability of the building or buildings. They can not comply for the simple reason that the element to be protected at any cost is precisely external composition thereof, thus forgetting the planner, to enter into questions of pure praxis. It is therefore advisable to re-examine the contents of the catalog. To be drawn and check on a quiet and deep to be reached to protect truly necessary. Do not enter more questions that require more extensive treatment, however, we can say that understanding how to protect this design is at least surprising because it is out of context, because no objective values, as we said, that make worthy of such consideration and at the end of the day, because it has a unique entity and strong and sharp enough for that consideration.
§ Finally, it is more than ever bear in mind that the improvement actions or conservation to be found in the tab are aimed at the preservation of the facade and treatment of accessory to the building elements such as labels and other minor findings. Planner forgets something very important in this case. The maintenance of the building as is currently found in urban suicide. The curtailing the possibility exhausting the buildable-la given to adjacent buildings, low + V compared to the one that gives the very instrument of urban planning, low + II, which would accrue to the owner in another situation leads to a negative result both in aesthetically and economically. You can reach intermediate situations are allowed to exhaust the use of the owner and in turn, modulate the provision of project implementation through administrative title conditioned, aesthetic canons or capillaries that harmonize with the overall vision or maximalist one has of the city.
Again, these pages are looking for the rapprochement of positions that are not irreconcilable or ab initio faced, which have many common interests which is undoubtedly : the benefit of the city
. 
to planning the next event, take care and be happy. 
UDB
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment