Comunidanas Editorial already have a date certain for Primary unit Democratic-Sunday February 12, 2012 - and that we value positively, but would have preferred an earlier date.
also know and value by this method will select candidates unitary President, Governors and Mayors, also we will do in a single pass, in addition, we will use the same date, and, importantly, the unit is maintained above the natural differences in a diverse national alliance, as the Democratic Unity.
We still have outstanding issues on the primary process, which must be resolved very soon and wear in order to focus all on a powerful national movement, bringing us closer to permanent and voters unhappy with the ruling. These
pending decisions should properly combine the popular sentiment with political expediency. In pursuit of this, we feel the obligation to provide disinterested way some ideas, wishing to contribute to the ongoing debate to define the method, organization, standards, resources, infrastructure, marketing, etc..
In this regard, we recommend at this time to evaluate a primary modality seems to offer several interesting solutions when we compare their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
We refer to VOTING WITH MULTIPLE PRIMARY mode, in which each voter can vote simultaneously is not one, but several candidates for President (eg, up to 3 candidates other than sympathy, without having to make order of preference their votes), at the same time, you can also vote for several candidates to Governor and several candidates for mayor.
In our analysis we find that the method PRIMARY VOTING WITH MULTIPLE:
- Adapts to and decided by Democratic Unity, because it allows you to select a single date and a single turn unit candidates for President, Governors and Mayors, thereby saving time and resources.
- Allows fully implement the consensus unit in positions where it is politically convenient is not required Elementary.
- makes it feasible to take the primary results as a reference to form the corresponding candidates in proportion to the votes cast for each card (as D'Hondt method or other agreed), for the collegiate bodies (state and Legislative Councils, Municipal Councils).
- discourages the disqualification of candidates by the Government, because we do not cause much damage, because with this kind of Elementary and we have chosen by popular vote to substitutes (this also applies to the current disabled).
- It contributes to a perception of greater legitimacy to the resulting unit candidates, and each winner will get most votes in a single primary vote (those of direct supporters, plus the votes of those who are supporters of other candidates but also see him with sympathy and give one of 3 votes).
- Encourages harmonious competition between candidates, since each one will try to win the votes of those who are direct supporters of other candidates, thus avoiding internal attacks between them.
- Meets with increasing number of voters, because if no candidate wins preferred by a voter may be winning one for which I also felt sympathy.
- promotes voter participation of more citizens, especially those who have no particular preference, but several candidates sympathetic unit.
- is more likely to attract the voters vote no definite position or disgruntled ruling party because it has highest potential amplitude and less partisanship.
SWOT attached Table shows the characteristics of this procedure, which seems to adapt quite well to the agreements already taken.
Click the link to view the SWOT analysis ==> http://www.slideshare.net/Venezuela_Libre/13-primarias-votacion-multiple-foda
0 comments:
Post a Comment